Activists at Stillwater lakes Forum

General Category => General Discussion => : catsrus March 31, 2008, 11:31:45 AM



: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: catsrus March 31, 2008, 11:31:45 AM
 :) :)HEY EVERYBODY AT THE MEETING THE BOARD ANNOUNCED THAT THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF STILLWATER WILL BE COMING OUT VERY SOON.  I AM VERY EXCITED.  I'LL CALL THE OFFICE AND FIND OUT THE NAME OF THE SITE AND LET EVERYONE KNOW. 


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: STONEHEAD2505 March 31, 2008, 11:52:55 AM
LET US KNOW!!!



: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Noreen March 31, 2008, 12:23:58 PM
Catsrus - When you call the office, can you check to see how much they are spending on the development of "their" site, where they will have total control and will "censor" all material (their words as per the minutes), as well as yearly maintenance?  We have offered them an area on this site where they can have full control, free of charge.  Again, they're spending our money needlessly and recklessly, while the roads and the sewer fall into total disrepair.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: GeorgiePorgie April 30, 2008, 12:51:37 AM
Hi Ruben:
I really like all your posts, but it would be nice to put them in the right category, anyway, this thread I may say is about the WebSite proposed by the board, and here is my take on it, even though I wrote about the subject before:
 
As an excert from CatsRus  previous post:"  I often wonder how many people on this website actually pay their way in this community.  I would hate to think that people in bad standing are not only bad mouthing everyone, but giving out false information to the good peope of this community. 

and Bla Bla Bla again and then "  I thank my lucky stars there are people in charge that give a hoot and KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT."

So here is the question :

What about false information presented by board members to the good community members in proper standing just before a voting procedures ?
The good people of this community are simply being deceived to serve the agenda for at least couple of members of the  board. 

As far as those people in charge who know what they are talking about, I bet none of them know to ask for the Source Code of the newly proposed Website, since none of them would  even know what it means, or what the implications would be for not having such a thing, only time can tell, and at one point will prove their ignorance; the two most important things in any community are the sewer functionality ( being Number One ) and the access roads, our board had failed us unfortunately on both. So what makes anybody think they can do better in any other field ?
The security is outsourced therefore the cost is exuberant, and all other commities up to now are just a distraction.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: puchichis June 21, 2008, 08:34:06 PM
Just another tool to milead and misinform us.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Inquizative August 22, 2008, 08:37:51 AM
Hello everyone,

     Slowly but surely the official web-site is functioning.  I need someone to see if they can log-in and see the various things on it. If you do not have a log in and password please request one and an e-mail will be sent for confirmations.

 There are 3 surveys, a forum (called "board") and a bulletin for posting messages(like the presidents message).  If you can log on please take time to fill out the surveys that are posted.  Spread the word about advertising on it.

Advertising on it(the website) will pay for itself and if that happens it will be less money out of our pockets to keep it running.  Advertising information will be obtained once an e-form is filled out.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: GeorgiePorgie August 22, 2008, 10:24:22 AM
Hi April:

You must be very busy, or distracted, can you please tell us the web address, so we can copy and paste it, you left that part out.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Inquizative August 22, 2008, 01:05:14 PM
George,
     Yes, I am busy and I was distracted all at the same time. Sorry.  Here is the link you can copy and paste it into your web browser:

http://www.mystillwaterlakes.com/outside_home.asp

To Everyone:
 Please let me know if or what problems you have for getting access to this site.

-April


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: SODOM August 22, 2008, 01:21:40 PM
APRIL,

I UNDERSTAND THAT THE BOARD WILL BE BLOCKING “UNDESIRABLES” FROM OUR “COLLECTIVELY OWNED” WEBSITE.
HOW MANY LOT OWNERS HAVE BEEN BLOCKED?


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Inquizative August 22, 2008, 03:14:06 PM
Sodom,
       Permissions are allowed via "good standing" status.  Having access, all depends on if names and addresses are presented to the host's web site.  All one has to do is request a log-in and password, when prompted enter name and address but, please, use the physical address of the property owned in the community.  It helps the host of the website identify "good standing" status.
-Hope this helps. 

-April


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: puchichis August 22, 2008, 03:57:01 PM
I see that the kids playing basketball in the photo banner of the website is not our basketball court. That is deceptive advertisement and not a proper display of our ( SLCA ) poorly kept and rundown sports facility. I bet that the picture of the family riding their bikes are not from this community either. Another way the board shows it's deceptive ways.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Spitfire August 22, 2008, 05:19:32 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...and let's not forget the picture of the Schnauzer taking a Schnitz!

Who the heck's dog is that?   ;D


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Spitfire August 22, 2008, 05:45:08 PM
Sodom,

All due respect...what do you mean by "undesirables"? Sounds too much like the board's version of "Deadbeat".

Will the homeowners faced with the decision of paying their mortgage, heating, water, electric bills; over paying their dues because they may just be making ends meet, fall under the category of "Undesirable"?

Spitfire A.K.A David Nieves  :) ;) :D ;D :-*


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Inquizative August 22, 2008, 07:09:04 PM
Dave,
     I hear you loud and clear.  It is really difficult with three kids and one person with limited/seasonal income supporting the household.  We have to play the juggle game and some/most times bills are dropped. 

To All:  The website has preloaded pictures on the homepage.  If you have some NICE pictures, (lol) of the community you can e-mail them to me and I will try to put them on.  Autumn is coming and the back lake looks really nice when the leaves have various colors.  Has anyone seen the surveys I posted? Can anyone log-in?  Did anyone get passwords and ID's?
-April


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: SODOM August 23, 2008, 03:38:30 PM
If your status has to be in "good standing," does that mean that deadbeats are not allowed?  How about political critics?  How about the "SILENT MAJORITY"?  What is the purpose of this website other than a private community gossip, “for yentas only"  forum.   Am I right, Dave!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Spitfire August 23, 2008, 09:20:54 PM
Sodom,

Apparently you find us Yentas very intertaining...and did you say "Dave"---Yes you did, because though I tend to spit a little fire here and there and go by the username of spitfire, I don't hide behind the name. As a matter of fact my email isn't hidden either, as all I long for is a better community.

You call them whatever you'd like, but please try to answer these questions for me.

Define deadbeat, as it applies to a community homeowner at SLCA?

You stated previously that it is, ". .our Collectively owned website"---When did we have a "Collective" vote to acquire it in the first place?

What could there possibly be on the new site that absolutely, positively has to be kept from someone who has not paid up all their dues? Sounds more like a site for a "groyser tzuleyger"!

If you prefer, you could send the answers directly to my email address, just keep in mind...I have "emailer ID".   ;D





: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: SODOM August 24, 2008, 02:25:44 PM
Spitfire,

Oi, Vai! Vat is this?  Ve have an Israeli pilot here?  Vat is Spitfire, an Israeli pilot on a F-14?   You speak Yiddish, also!?  So now ve hav two Daves one is a pilot and the other is the VP who sounds like he drinks vine out of a shtein.  So, it’s Dave the pilot, and Dave the Shlemiel!  Now I don't need to conshentrate to remember vich is vich.

Ok, I meant the other one. 

You ask Vat is “deadbeat?”  Vat is deadbeat has to do vit nothing.  I looked it up!  “A parent that has freely chosen not to financially support their children,” So I ashk,  Vat, ve now have an orphanage in the Clubhouse?  So the lady vit the springtime name, said “good shtanding.” Vat do I know? Good shtanding, bad shtanding, I spend most of my time in a vheelchair!

Vut I can say, “Collectively owned website”, should run like a rheal commune, every one should be Kosher!  No Palestinians allowed!

I apoliyise I meant to say Yenteh.

Dave the pilot, you vish to expose yourself to the entire vorld?  You have my blessings!  I chose to sit in a vheelchair at home and enjoy vatching judge Judy.  I vatch every episode, vhich I refer to as “Yenteh Justice!”  I think ve need her on the Shtillwater Lakes Board of Direktors.  Nancy Schmember vould be perfect, she is ellegant and forceful not your average Yenteh. She vill Keep the Goyim in check, if you know vhat I meen?  Please give her outmost coshiderashon.

I remain you Kosher contributor,   SODOM ???


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Spitfire August 25, 2008, 05:24:26 PM
...Now that's intertainment!!!

Sodom,

I can not thank you enough for a good laugh and a great sense of humor.

As a token of my appreciation I offer you this "idish" riddle:

First I will give you a hint...it is what our board members, except for a select few, say three times aloud just before making decisions that affect this entire community.

I've taken the liberty of translating to the english langauge.


Eye Yam Sofa King We Todd It!!!

I did mean "idish", as in, I dish/ I spit, yadda, yadda, yadda...

Spitfire


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: THE EXPERT August 29, 2008, 05:20:51 PM
Hey Sodom,
That is some funny stuff right there!  I had a good laugh!

Picture this Sodom:


   Maria and Ernie want to sell their lakeside Mansion. They ask the association to give them a release to sell their home.  The Board advises Ernie and Maria that they have to get it from Thomas Wilkins.  Thomas Wilkins presents them with an Exclusive One Year Contract (@ 25% commission) to list and sell their Mansion. 

   Ernie and Maria scream out, “What do you mean! We have the right to sell our home by whichever real estate agent we choose!”

   Well, says Tom, “I guess you will have to wait until Hell freezes over, before you get a  release from me!”

   Oi Vai, is Ernie going to be mad!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: SODOM September 05, 2008, 11:38:47 PM
!NEWS FLASH!

"FLY ON THE WALL NEWS" IS REPORTING, THAT WE NOW HAVE A NEW LAWYER!

APRIL AND NOREEN IS THAT NEWS TO YOU?




: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: LEISURELADY September 07, 2008, 10:48:37 AM
why are we not allowed to conduct meetings any longer in the clubhouse
does anyone know whats going on ?


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Spitfire September 07, 2008, 11:21:04 PM
Leisurelady,

The first sign I saw by the clubhouse regarding the office closing was posted there on August 29th, which stated something to the affect of "...the office would be closed due to harrassment of NEPA staff members".

I do recall that my wife did go by the clubhouse office on Wednesday August 27th to try to obtain minutes from some prior meetings. She was told by Jessica that the minutes were not in the "binder". She told Jessica that she would be back later for them after Jessica had called Patricia Gleason to advise her that my wife was there looking for them. Jessica was also looking for additional notes that were not in order, so my wife told her she would return for them and she did; however when my wife did return she was told that none of the notes she was looking for were there.

Now...I really don't see that as being harrassing. Besides--the above occurred more than two weeks ago and to date we have still not had a visit from regional police to inform us of the charge so serious that they would fear opening the office.

That said...I know it wasn't my wife that harrassed them and or caused any "inflictions".

What I do know is that my wife had sent out an email to pretty much everyone, including the Current President of the United States (Don't believe me, just check out the email addresses within the copy of the email she sent) in which she stated facts about what is going on in this community. Since then, several government agencies including the FBI have responded. My feelings are that they must have gotten a visit from one of the agencies and have probably moved all documents to Stroudsburg for safer keeping. I also feel that the extra staff at Stroudsburg could better assist in the Safe keeping of the minutes, which are now just as valuable as the books.

Now all communications have to go through Wilkins.

With all due respect to my fellow homeowners that may be in denial...doesn't this kind of ring bells and whistles when the very management company we employ calls ALL the shots? Doesn't it seem quite odd that it will take signing of a confidentiallity agreement and/or court order to see the very financials we are all entitled to see anyway per by-laws? We've presented nothing but facts, yet certain board members insist that we (the grapevine, A.K.A the three amigos, A.K.A concerned citizens) are spreading rumors.
If that be the case, then why is it that the board has not presented a single fact yet?
Why do they insist on continuouslly, illegally threatining us if we don't stop video taping the meetings, even though it is our right per by-laws...the very same by-laws they use against us when convenient for them.

Now I leave you with this last thought...Do you honestly think the PUC/Co-op issue is over?

I will be posting some facts regarding this issue in the very near future.

Read on below a copy of an email response I just sent regarding office closing and the Vector security issue.

To the person that forwarded this one to me…Thanks.

 

I have entered my share of comments in parenthesis and underlined below.

 

 

From: Maria Santoro-Hernandez

Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 10:15 PM

To: anepots@yahoo.com

Cc: BARBARA ; Cbeck CARLA & HAL ; cindy ; CYNTHIA ; CARL DAMICO ; DELORES / GEORGE ; ELVIS ; JOHN LAMPRAKOS ; KAREN ; MARGARET ; MICHELLE ; PETRUE55@YAHOO.COM ; TANYA ; SERGERIO ALVERIZA ; April Bunje ; Bonnie Combs ; Matt Ducey ; Noreen Gorka ; Patti Gleason ; Ron Kluge ; Curtis Moore ; Dee Hannigan ; John Truoccolo ; Marsha Haygood ; Milta Zeno

 

-Annie-

 Now I know how all these rumors get started. Do you really enjoy misleading your neighbors and instigating public uproar. (FACT: The board knew about the whole PUC/CO-OP issue in January, but didn’t do a thing until March, which would have been to have their select group of homeowners vote for Co-op—“Misleading and caused the obvious uproar at the June meeting”.) Why? Do you really believe this is good for your community? (Apparently they thought converting SLCA into a Co-op was good for the community.) Apparently all your neighbors do not appreciate your fabrications which is why I am in receipt of your message. (I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt that the neighbor that did forward it to Maria just wanted some clarification)

 

How could you possibly, in good concience, state:  "MORE THAN LIKELY THE BOARDS GETTING READY TO TURN THE COMMUNITY OVER TO TOMMY AND TURN IT INTO A CO-OP!!!!" without a shred of information having to do with anything of the like. (Apparently not all board members are aware that the “CO-OP” issue is not dead and that there actually is clear evidence that, whether it is only a few board members or Wilkins only, the intentions are to continue pursuing CO-OP if it is the only way of keeping PUC from regulating this community’s sewer system) (PUC Regulating means books must be open)It is this same careless attitude towards maliciously accusing people with baseless misinformation and blatant lies that incites riots and can even get people hurt. How does the office being closed temporarily as stated in the message below say ANYTHING about TURNING OVER THE COMMUNITY TO "TOMMY" AND TURNING IT INTO A COOP?! (Would not want to speak for Annie on this one, but what I think she’s trying to say is that—How much more control can we give Wilkins than by keeping all the meetings at his house—so to speak?) The fact that you would make such a thing up and try to spread it to your neighbors is shocking (I personally don’t find it shocking at all—I think Annie wants a better community, just like a vast majority of us) and very dissappointing to me. I thought more highly of you than that.

In addition, you know very well that I went out of my way to make sure that a neighbor's complaint about Security was heard and addressed even though 9/4/08 was a closed Board meeting having to do with road bids. I have always been very courteous to you, even when it was clear to me that you were insinuating I took the $10,000  grant money that I along with the security committee got Scavello to guarantee us. You didn't lay that thought to rest until you went to Scavello's office and confirmed for yourself that we were still waiting for his money. (Just asking—where is the $10,000 dollar grant Maria included in her presentation? Why no “honest” update on that, as it was presented to ALL members in good standing during the security vote?)

I have been very clear from the beginning (???) about the security committee's recommendations. (Who’s on the security committee, and/or how many?—Last I heard, Maria was the ONLY security committee member. Hmmmm? FYI…According to the current by-laws, a board member…shall not serve as a committee member. Wouldn’t Maria’s sole membership in this committee be a clear violation of said by-law?) We (See prior underlined sentence) recommended we try 24/7 security for one year and then evaluate our results and vote once again. It was stated many times at the last security meeting that we were not voting for Vector, we were voting for Security YES or NO. (But it was also stated by both Dave Weinstein and Attorney Ralston that the security contract was only for one year) And the final vote by the community was to keep security. (By 13 Votes) The Security Committee (Maria) recommended we continue with Vector for this year.Vector renews it's contracts on a yearly basis.(We were NEVER told of this) I for one, (need I say more?) would like for the community itself to select the type of security we renew for next year. (How noble) Personally, I am sick and tired of the preposterous allegations that I get some kind of "kickback" from Vector. I will be proposing to the Board and Security Committee (Would the proposal to the security committee be done in front of a mirror?) that the community be allowed to vote for the security company of it's choice after having the ones willing to come up, present to the community, however , the Board would have to give final approval for this. (So…we can choose the one that we’d like, but get Vector anyway?) That's a lot more say than you have on who does the roads or who plows. (Does she mean we actually have “say” on stuff?) But, it seems it's much more enjoyable to add a negative twist and assume the worst in people, right ?!

Is it possible that someone can volunteer to work for their community without being slandered with baseless accussations? (Yes—Noreen and April)You , along with some others have taught me that I can no longer speak casually and try to assist my neighbors (When she says, “…assist my neighbors” is she including the entire Security Committee?) because whatever I say can and will get twisted (That’s why it’s so important to video tape everything, so everyone can see the tr u t h…So that’s why the board is so against video taping. Hmmm?) and taken out of context. So, I will now , only speak on record, (Careful here) so that there is proof of what is said or let legal counsel speak for myself or the Board as a whole.

I can only hope that the  majority has the sense to look for their own facts(My goodness…that’s why we are in this predicament. Many have found facts, yet through either denial or acting in concert, the board has done nothing to address the main fact that “the tail that wags the dog” clearly exist in this “Board—NEPA Management relationship.) rather than just believe the misinformation that does so much damage (only damage here is to the Calm sands of “Shut up”—“Sit down”—“Pay your dues” that have been disturbed by truly concerned homeowners.) to our community.

 

Maria Santoro (A.K.A. “Sole Security Committee member”)

 

 





: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: THE EXPERT September 08, 2008, 10:53:34 AM
A very interesting and lively Santoro/Spitfire Debate!

Here are some facts which should give both a sense of security.  A few years ago Mr. Carmine Buonanno was removed from the Board of Directors because he was allegedly harassing Mr. Wilkins Property Manager.  That is, harassing her, by demanding information which she either refused to provide, or claimed that she didn’t have!

Mr. Wilkins sent a letter to Nancy Schmerber demanding that Mr. Buonanno (who by the way, received over 70 votes to get on the Board Directors, more than anyone else, including Schmerber!) be immediately removed from the Board. Otherwise, he would no longer provide staff at the Clubhouse. 

Mr. Schmerber who was then President, immediately called an emergency secret meeting in the middle of the night, and removed Mr. Buonanno.  All conducted while the community slept, and in violation of our by-laws.

Can you possibly imagine that the President of our community Board of Directors, would dare to remove a duly elected member of the Board, based on the demands of a hireling!  Someone who has no more standing in this community than a maid?  Someone who threatened to breach a contract with this community if he did not get his way! 

What is going to happen the day after tomorrow, will be a classic example of:

“Those who ignored the past are destined to repeat it!”

ONLY IN AMERICA!  CHECK OUT THIS STORY!
http://www.local6.com/news/17427900/detail.html


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Inquizative September 15, 2008, 08:16:39 AM
Good morning residents
I have been working diligently to get the official web site up and functional.  You can find it on the world wide web at: www.mystillwaterlakes.com
There is no forum. Sorry. You can enter comments on the site via the feedback tab.  This allows the board of directors to do research on the topics that matter to you.
The security committee has posted some very insightful information pertaining to the community.  Check it out.
If anyone would like to volunteer on a committee you can stop by the clubhouse during any of the meetings and fill out a committee volunteer form.
The beautification committee is scheduling a clean-up day.  Please see the official web site for more information.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Spitfire September 15, 2008, 09:54:57 AM
Hello April,

How's the board "research" coming along regarding the topic of the Petition we sent in to have the board removed? I believe that may be the most important topic that matters to all that signed the petition.

Not trying to put you on the spot here, but the kitchen is really hot right now. :-)

For whatever it's worth...you've got my vote to get you back on the board after our version of "Clean-up day".

Spitfire


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: SODOM September 15, 2008, 11:26:10 AM
Shpringtime Lady - Vhat no Forum!!!
Vhat good is this?  I vish to give my shpiel to the commune!
So now you tell me I most give my shpiel to Comedy Club!
Oi Vei!  My vords vill fall on deaf ears! So vat’s the good
Shpringtime Lady?   I vill have to send my vife Mildred to
Clubhouse and give Run and Vinestein a piece of her mind. Ve been magried for forty five years and she tells eveyvone she is a Alteh moid.  Maybe Dave and Run vill keep her, and put her on the Board.  From my lips to God’s ears!  Vhat I don’t vorry!  Sprigtime Lady, you vish to help me vit my vheelchair?


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Inquizative September 16, 2008, 07:14:55 AM
LOL! (laugh out Loud), Sodom!  Your comments in Yidishlike tones sounds like Mel Brooks would be talking.  He is my favorite actor.  Gotta have humor in your life or it will be dull.

Forum: Ya, I know I was upset to find out that the board had decided (before I got voted in) that there was to be no forum.  But lets be greatful that Mike has this site for an open forum!

Spitfire: I can not really comment on the pettition issue (I hope you understand).  I can say that things are moving in a positive direction.  Everyone's (residents) conserns are being addressed.  It is a slow, red tape kinda process.

To All: The Expert posted some interesting information about Mr Buonanno.  Good thing to know.

I do want to say, I am glad to see you (in the plural form meaning you all) are contributing to a more informed meeting for me.  I appreciate your efforts in getting information out there and helping in the best way you can.

As for the clean-up day even though there is a lot going on behind the scenes we still need to gather in the best way we can to keep our community great.  Like I said in my blurb that introduced me before the annual vote.  Even though family has fights we still get together for family gatherings.


On a side note:  I would like to do a haunted beach on the weekend before Halloween.  As part of a recreation committee thing for everyone.  It's Oct. 25th and 26th.  I still have to get approval so this mention is a preliminary reach.  Does anyone know who does what my kids call "scary street"?  There are a couple of houses on Vacation that do a great spooky extravaganza every year.  I would like to get their participation.  Of course anyone who can contribute will be welcome.  Once I get a meeting date and approval I will send a e-bulletin from the official web-site.


: Re: Security / New Attorney update
: Spitfire September 16, 2008, 06:26:14 PM
I'd like to update everyone on two topics of concern, but first...let us have a moment of silence for the passing of a Mind..."What a terrible thing". (See CLueless Moore's response to me on the bottom)

Below you will find some email correspondence in which I received a reply from one of the actual Security Committee members. She informed me that she was one of a few other members.
I posed a question of what I believed to be a valid concern. The word going around the community is that security, along with the fees of course, are here to stay as the last security meeting was for final vote of yes or no to security. The implications were that we would not be able to vote yes or no once Vector made a year and that we would only be able to vote on other security company options.

Not through a fly on the wall, but a big'ol spider that got caught up in his own web, who gave us confirmation that we will in fact have an opportunity to vote Security/Vector out next year. (That would be in March if my calculation of a year isn't off)

I'm pretty sure that someone is a bit dissappointed that the spider spoke once again. One would think that after the "PCC, UPC, PIC, PCI, speech at the PUC/CO-Op meeting he gave us, that the board would say something to him.

Thanks for clarifying that for us Mr. Chairmen of the Security Committee. Just another one of those things that make you go Hmmmmm?

The other topic which was confirmed, was that we have a new attorney.
Gee, I'm going to miss Andy. We were just beginning to get to know each other.

Anyway...Good Luck to Andy in his future endeavors.

Hope the new attorney can advise the board on all the fiduciary stuff.

Here's the first question the board should be asking the new attorney...

How does a NON-Board member (Curtis) know about the new attorney before anyone else in the community, especially if that would have been something in Ron's bag of "Executive Session items"?



Response to an email I sent in which I referred to the "Lone Security Committee Member":________________________________________
From: Marsha Haygood [mailto:mhhaygood@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 9:23 AM
To: 'David Nieves'; BARBO1@PTD.NET; cbeck743@comcast.net; USMolloy@aol.com; cruz_cyn@hotmail.com; puraflo1@comcast.net; dgrillo2@verizon.net; ecorreausa@hotmail.com; johnlamprakos@verizon.net; KMATELESKO@AOL.COM; lnieves@ptd.net; MARG5678@PTD.NET; MIMIV@OPTONLINE.NET; PETRUE55@YAHOO.COM; Snoopy63nj@aol.com; NALVA11043@AOL.COM; gramalkin75@yahoo.com; BONZCOMBS@YAHOO.COM; MRK2708@PTD.NET; noreen_g@yahoo.com; DUCE1@PTD.NET; pgleason@wilkins1.com; fidget13@ptd.net; clm4200@msn.com; 2hannigans@comcast.com; gthome@ptd.net; write2zeno@aol.com; anepots@yahoo.com; ria_santoro@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Security Committee
 
Hi David
My name is Marsha Haygood and I wanted you to know that I have and continue to be on the security committee.  Due to my travel schedule, I have not been able to attend the recent community meetings but have been updated on what has been happening.  For your information, I have lived in Stillwater for the past 20 years and hope that these issues can be resolved so that we can have community members that spend their energy working together for the community rather than against each other.
I personally do not want to be part of what looks like an email war, but wanted you to know that I, along with several others were on the Security committee along with Maria.
 
Thanks
 
Marsha Haygood



Response to Security Committee Member:
Hello Marsha, It is nice to meet you. Sorry I've taken so long to respond.been really busy.
 
I know you didn't want to be part of this email war, as you called it, but keep in mind that you are still part of this community and that many things that happen within it affect you as much as it does the rest of us.
 
If you are part of the security committee, I must apologize, not for what I wrote in my previous email, but more so on behalf of the board and/or management for not including you on any of the minutes as being a member of the security committee.
I truly don't doubt that you are a member; however, please understand that every single set of meeting minutes I've seen that list all committee members show Maria's name and right next to it "Open".  I even attended a meeting recently in which she didn't mention a single person on the committee, yet when all the other board members were asked, they did mention the members of their committees.
Folks here are really upset as to what is going on in this community, especially Security.
 
Rumor has it that Security is here to stay forever, though Maria's email below contradicts that by stating, "Vector renews it's contracts on a yearly basis."
I only ask that you, as a current security committee member please answer the following question;
 
Will we have, and when will we have the voting meeting to once again vote on Security? (More specifically.vote them out)
 
By the way.in the weeks to come, you will see just how much energy we will be putting into making this a much better community. If you like, I can update you as we move forward. ;-)
 
Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
 
David


2 Cents I received from Clueless Moore:
From: Curtis Moore [mailto:clm4200@msn.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 2:15 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Security Committee

I see that I am not the only person that you been writing. If you had been paying your dues on time you would have known the security is a one year contract. It will be voted on as it has been for the past two years. The time and date will be posted as it has been for the past two years. If you are member in good standing at the time of the vote, you vote just like all the other members. ( don't be late paying your dues with a new attorney your vote may not count we don't want what happen this year to happen again )
 
The only rumors about security if there is any are rumors were started my you or a members of your group. The reason I say that is all others who have been to meeting from start knew that security is a year to year contract. I just seems odd to me that you would use the word rumor When comes to security. I guess that you didn't know forever is a very long time.
 
You said that people ( I like to put a face with a person and not uses the word people) are upset with security have them come forward and we can talk about it with the head of the company. They can tell him what they upset about. We will call a meeting to hear your complaints. I guess that would be to much to ask.
 
Curtis Moore member of the security committee




: Re: Threats from a former board member
: Spitfire September 17, 2008, 10:44:07 AM
Hello everyone,

I know some of you may hate this, but I must.

I just received a threatining email from Curtis. It scared the Beejeezus out of me. ;-)

(See below)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know I am getting tried of you bull shit. You told me about public records and any one could look at them. I took at your public records and I don't think that you want them put on the website. You may be asking your self what in my public record that you wouldn't want people to see. I will give a few word to you that about paying taxes, being time with your payments, being on time on paying rent in the place your family was living. Liens and judgments are public records so cut your bullshit or people may be able to find your public records and your learn about your past. Ever one is so dumb and you know it all. I would tell you people who live glass house should not throw stones.
 
Curtis Moore 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyway...for all those that would be interested in my past, here goes;


*****SORRY, BUT THE INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY POSTED HERE HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT REALLY IS NO ONE OTHER THAN MY WIFE'S AND MY BUSSINESS*****

If there are any other items I left out, I would appreciate this free service Curtis the "PI" may offer me.

Morale of the story is that just as my wife and I fought the management company of our old apartment and never backed down, we will not back down in our current fight for what is right for this entire community. Unlike some folks, we do not have a private and/or personal interest or agenda. Our fight is for issues that affect the entire community.

The house we live in is our very first. It took a lot of blood, sweat and tears to get it. It is what we like to call, "Our american dream". Unfortunately it has become the american nightmare for us ever since the whole PUC/CO-Op issue surfaced. Prior to that, I would have never even imagined that more homeowners were just as concerned about issues like; dues, roads, security, sewer, and where exactly our money is going. All we wanted was answers, but all we got was more and more cover up.

I know that there are many homeowners that for the moment, can not contribute too much if any, time to the cause, but rest assured, there are a lot more homeowners dedicating a lot of time and effort to getting this communtiy to a point in which we can all live happy and harmoniously.

They say, "Silence is Golden". That said, I will not be posting anymore, (Surely not because of the above threat) until our next milestone.

Spitfire




: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: THE EXPERT September 17, 2008, 02:41:43 PM
Here is a posting I copied from today's article in the Pocono Record. It concerns a law suit filed by a few characters on the PCP's Board of Directors, against a homeowners website at PCP:

       "These characters are nothing more than spineless politicians.  Can you imagine any current politician in office, suing talk-radio-jocks for what they say?  If they did, they would have to use their own funds to do it!  No doubt that the money for this outrageous harassment suit, is coming out of community funds! By that standard, the Defendant should also be able to tap into community funds, to defend his right to freedom of speech, not to mention the same rights for the rest of the community!  If the Courts allow these private community imperial authorities, to establish an authoritarian dictatorship, then the Federal Government will have to step in and give private community residents the same protection that it now offers to those escaping from Castro’s tyranny in Cuba!

Judge Vican! Send them a clear message:
 
“IF YOU CAN’T STAND THE HEAT! GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN!” (Harry S. Truman)


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: puchichis September 18, 2008, 01:29:04 AM
I am saddend by the actions of the person that did this to you david. In my old block in Manhattan and traditional thinking. I would have given that person a total beat down. Your past is that, your past. And no ones business for that matter. The game of politics is a dirty business. That my brother, i guess you know. However, i am behind you & your spouse. I applaude you for your tenaciousness and vigor for the truth in our community. If you choose not to post. It will make you only stronger. And our network better informed. The ignorant people will stay in the shadows and keep being the yes, yes puppets of the board. We will be the rebels and fight for total disclosure and demand accountability for the squandering of our communitys money. Truth of the matter is. A person that has the balls to fight against oppression & tyranny has my sincere gratitude and respect. And not to mention, i've got your back. We as a community will prevail. God willing!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS September 18, 2008, 08:58:42 AM
Dave
      You are a statesman,whos honesty I admire and respect!
      Your ethics are impeccable,the eloquence of your convictions,
      inspirational! You are a true asset to the community!       
       My full support and vote in your quest to resolve issues!
 
                        Thank you for not giving up or in.
                              Annie Mills


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: SODOM September 18, 2008, 09:20:13 AM
RNACOR12 - FLY ON THE WALL NEWS HAS REPORTED THAT:

Long before there was a Curtis Moore, that there was, and continues to be a former member of the Board, who has access to credit and other financial information concerning all residents of this community.  An employee of TRW! According to all reports he is not a private dick!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Stealth September 19, 2008, 08:36:44 AM
Hello my fellow SLCA Homeowners,

I've been on the sidelines for a while, and for the moment would prefer to remain known to all as "Stealth". I recently registered for this site because it appears as I've lost my "Guest" privileges to watch from a distance.

I frankly am quite appauled at what is going on here. I'll call it for what it is...Political BULL $%@T!

Can someone please enlighten me as to the following?:

Why is anyone in this community being harrassed for requesting information, we as homeowners are entitled to per by-laws?

Why is it that the current board members are so blind to the facts that have been brought out by many of the concerned members on this site?

Why is the office closed, making it nothing but inconvenient for the homeowners of this community?

Why is the board advertising their site on this one?

I keep reading hints regarding the community going Co-Op, but yet I see no proof of this--Can someone please share the facts on that one? (I for one, am against Co-ops)

Why don't we see anymore views of the "Silent Majority" on this site?
Is it because they are finally seeing things for what they are?
Does a silent majority actually exist?

Spitfire, quite frankly, you've had my vote from the very beginning; however, I would prefer you continue posting facts, and nothing but. Don't get me wrong, I've had quite a chuckle at some of your post, but in my honest opinion, you shouldn't let yourself fall so deep into the political name calling game that makes you appear to be one of them.


Stealth





: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: GeorgiePorgie September 19, 2008, 09:26:03 AM
Hi Stealth:

I think you were wise to watch from a distance, you are even wiser to be in stealth mode, you don't need any harrassment !

I will try to answer few of your questions, I am not sure if I have the right answer, I will share my opinion and you along with everyone else can figure out the rest.

I have no clue about the legitimacy of the harrassment issue, but apparantly this type of tactic had been tried in the past. ( find out how Carmine Bonano was removed from the board ).

Current board members are not blind, they may be in denial, and remember it takes a majority vote on any issue. ( one of the unwritten rule to be a board member in communities, is to put the betterment of the community ahead of self interest, and that is not HERE ! )

The office is closed because of the harrassment issue.

The board advertising their website on this site is not a problem. Unlike the official website,  it has been the policy of this site to be an open forum, and it has always been honored.

The coop issue versus P.U.C. is not a dead issue, it's just in a coma, the issue will come back at some point in the future, currrently waiting some legal proceeding.

You won't see the views of silent majority, they need to feel the hit very hard ( especially in their pocket books ) to speak again, and when they do awake, they are easily manipulated, look at them as the american public chosen between Obama and Mc Cain or Sara rimless glasses.





: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS September 20, 2008, 04:09:34 AM
Stealth

     Click on home page legal issues,for more information.

                         Annie Mills


: Another oldie but a goodie
: David February 13, 2012, 03:03:09 AM
Here is a posting I copied from today's article in the Pocono Record. It concerns a law suit filed by a few characters on the PCP's Board of Directors, against a homeowners website at PCP:

       "These characters are nothing more than spineless politicians.  Can you imagine any current politician in office, suing talk-radio-jocks for what they say?  If they did, they would have to use their own funds to do it!  No doubt that the money for this outrageous harassment suit, is coming out of community funds! By that standard, the Defendant should also be able to tap into community funds, to defend his right to freedom of speech, not to mention the same rights for the rest of the community!  If the Courts allow these private community imperial authorities, to establish an authoritarian dictatorship, then the Federal Government will have to step in and give private community residents the same protection that it now offers to those escaping from Castro’s tyranny in Cuba!

Judge Vican! Send them a clear message:
 
“IF YOU CAN’T STAND THE HEAT! GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN!” (Harry S. Truman)


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS February 13, 2012, 09:36:49 AM
What I can imagine is some politicians in ca-hoots
with these Boards!! My opinion only!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: admin February 24, 2012, 12:06:57 AM
I agree with your opinion Anna Mae.  I will further say that, in my opinion, some board members are in ca-hoots with Law Firms, Management Companies, Banks, and Contractors. 

The good news is that Pennsylvania law recognizes the participation theory as a basis of liability.

"The general, if not universal, rule is that an officer of a corporation who takes part in the commission of a tort by the corporation is personally liable and an officer of a corporation who takes no part in the commission of the tort committed by the corporation is not personally liable."

The above quote is from an Opinion from the same court this websites Trademark Infringement actions is currently in, I bet I know at least five people who either are or were board member who don't sleep well at night.  I believe in KARMA.



: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: David March 12, 2012, 10:28:47 PM
Apparently...not only are they illegally charging residents 24 hours security for only 16 hours of actual security hours, as well as the "Organized Crime" known as membership dues, but they are also charging way TOO MUCH for sewer, based on the little to No money they've put into the sewer system throughout the years.

...but, who cares? There are still a whole heap of folks that continue to pay...

Tisk!-Tisk!

Just remember folks, it is your right, and more so, THE LAW to request validation of ANY and ALL debts!!!

The collection attorney they hired knows this, but he'll continue coming after you as long as you bow down and pay without questioning the validity of membership dues, security contract, and proportionate share of sewer payments.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: admin March 16, 2012, 12:32:28 AM
David,

My understanding is that it is very common for a corrupt homeowners association to move money from one account to another to cover cash-flow problems from bad management, embezzlement, and theft. To hide a scheme like this, the homeowner’s association will usually prepare false financial statements and will not let property owners see their bank statements. They will also provide false documents to buyers, like resale certificates, to make the associations appear to be financially solid.  If the association is really bad, my understanding is that they will mortgage property without property owner’s approval.  I understand it's really bad if they start selling property and assets without approval.  The final sign usually is that nothing is maintained, the roads, pool, and amenities go to pot. 
I hope your Association is not showing signs of this type of corruption.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS March 16, 2012, 07:58:20 AM
Third time around!!!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: David March 16, 2012, 02:51:45 PM
Hey Admin, here's a dumb question, or more like a "Rehistorical" question.

Hypohisterically speaking...

If you are part of a board of conspirators committing such crimes punishable by hefty jail time, and you decide to just not show up to as many meetings as possible; can't you just say, "I didn't know what was actually going on as; though I am on the board, I didn't attend many of the meetings within the past two years...for (personal reasons)?"

Wouldn't that get that person off the hook?
 
Fiduciary Message to follow........................................ Remember, "ABSENTEE" board member(s)!!! Doing nothing about the problem is the biggest part of the problem!!!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: admin March 16, 2012, 11:20:18 PM
David,

My understanding is that "An officer of a corporation who takes part in the commission of a tort by the corporation is personally liable" period. 

Based on your "Rehistorical" question, if a board member is not present during a meeting where a vote is being taken that is part of a commission of a tort, than the board member is not part of the commission and not liable.  If the board member was present and voted in favor of the act commissioning the tort then he/she is liable.  Although they may claim that they were mis-informed and try to play stupid, not a hard stretch for the Stillwater Lakes Civic Association Board. However, I would not want to be the Board member who motioned for the tortious act.  I don't believe the board member who makes the motion, in a court of law, could even claim the stupid defense on the count that as a fiduciary they would have had to show cause and have valid research and reasoning. 

A good example of a tortious act is the video and trademark lawsuits.  I would hate to be the board member who motioned for those lawsuits.  That person could ultimately be held responsible for the entire cost of both the plaintiffs and defenses litigation. 

My understanding only based on my legal research.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: admin March 25, 2012, 03:18:24 AM
People who commit fraud or misappropriation of funds for one's own use or other unauthorized purpose usually create plausible cover stories by blending elements of truth with fiction. They rely heavily on two tools: deceptive statements and falsified documents. People committing a fraud will lie, bend the truth, withhold or hide information and documents, and otherwise act to confuse, delay or block a person's path to the truth.

http://stillwaterlakes.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=58&Itemid=68 (http://stillwaterlakes.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=58&Itemid=68)


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: THE EXPERT March 28, 2012, 01:42:38 PM
TO THOSE OF YOU WHO SUPPORT, OR DON'T SUPPORT "RIGHT TO WORK LAWS!"
PLEASE JOIN US!


See e-mail below, sent to Pennsylvanians for Right to Work, Inc.

Dear Pennsylvanians for Right to Work, Inc.:

   I am the president of a group here in North East Pennsylvania, "The Coalition of Independent Owners," we would welcome your participation in helping us to formulate a law, along the same principle; as the “Right to Work Law”.

   The “Right to Residence Law!”.... As is the case where a contract exists between employer, and a union, which requires that all employees must become members of that union; there are also many citizens in this Commonwealth who are denied the right to live where they want to live by an existing contract which requires membership in a union. 

   Under existing contracts, (recognized by the Courts as legal) purchasers are forced  to become members, and forced to pay dues to an association. 

   Citizens throughout the Commonwealth, are forced against their will, to become members of a union, thus forcing them to abide by unwarranted rules, regulations, by-laws, support political action committees etc., and live under the same dictatorship principal that allow trade unions to dominate membership dues.

   These contracts are a despicable attack on individual liberties, as the individual has no property, ownership, stockholder, or shareholder rights, in these organization!  Under current laws individual owners are also financially liable for the debt of the entire organization! 

   We wish to see a law here in Pennsylvania which provides the citizens of this Commonwealth, with the right to live where they wish to live, without being subjected to the tyranny of a union or homeowners association.

Thank you for your support,


President - Coalition of Independent Owners



: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: puchichis April 01, 2012, 12:41:57 AM
Did anyone notice the pebbles used to fix-up the craters littered through out the community. We are going back to the stone age as management cant afford asphalt.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: admin April 02, 2012, 10:00:50 PM
Hi puchichis,

I'm sure that property owners, bus drivers, and visitors notice the pebbles being used to hide our deteriorating roads.  In fact, they are using these pebbles to not only hide the pot and crater holes, but entire sections of road.  This should make property owners mad.  But a better question, is did anybody notice that the board mortgaged the developments common property in 2007 to repave Nadine.  They are not allowed to borrow money without property owner’s approval.  What happened to the years of road repair fees they collected????" 

Also how did the board borrow more than a million dollars to expand and allegedly repair our sewer system, without property owner’s approval???  Where is the money from stand-by and usage fees????   Why, after a 1.3 million dollar loan, that we and future property owners will be paying for till the year 2030, is the developments lots that are connected to sewer un-buildable?

Yes, while they are using pebbles to hide our deteriorating roads, I believe the bigger question is what did this board do with our money????

Fight Back


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: admin April 04, 2012, 03:44:33 AM
Many property owners do not realize that "We're All in This Together".  I'm fighting, my friends are fighting and sadly I can name them on one hand Dave, Gorge, Lidia, Lou, and Walter.  I would also like to give credit to the few property owners that show up at most board meetings, and sadly I could also name them on one hand.  People need to realize that unless all of us stand together, they will win or waste more of your money trying to hide the truth.  I realize why people don't want to get involved, but sometimes you have no choice. 

Remember:  "We're All in This Together".  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkRuibCq1lM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkRuibCq1lM)

Other peoples view: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9ySxrzpP-g&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9ySxrzpP-g&feature=related)


: R-U-B-N Sued???
: David May 05, 2012, 12:12:42 AM
Are you being sued for dues, security etc.???

...then you must ask yourself------Are the board members paying their share???

We already have proven confirmation of at least one past board member that was allowed to slide along without paying dues and/or security.

Is it possible that there are more Sesame Street Dead Beats on the board that either don't pay now or have been allowed to slide along without paying in the past???

Is there a legal way of verifying this???

Stay tuned...


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: admin May 06, 2012, 01:58:54 AM
Hi David,
Since your referring to being sued, I thought I would take this opportunity to update the property owners about the Video lawsuit (Stillwater Lakes Civic Association v. Nievies), and the Trademark Infringement Lawsuit, both of which Director Maria Santoro Motioned to use property owner money (money that should be going to the roads and common areas), to authorize the legal team of Young and Haros to sue myself and others.

Video Suit:  Currently in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, where we were granted an "Allowance of Appeal".  All briefs and documents submitted to the Supreme Court are available for public viewing, and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania adheres to the highest standards of conduct to preserve justice.  Because of this, we expect the court to reverse the Commonwealth Courts decision and send it back to the trial court.  Price tag: Tens of thousands of dollars of your money to stop recording the boards meetings (aka: stop documentation).   

Trademark Suit:  The Board seems to have realized this was a baseless case and admitted it by filing a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, a motion that means we are the prevailing party on all counts.  Price tag: we believe around 200,000 dollars.  However, we are going for legal fees which will add a substantial amount. 

It does not end here; this now leads to future claims of Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process, Reverse Domain Hijacking, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Contract, Harassment, and many other civil and criminal charges. 

Thank Maria Santoro for her motion to bring these suits.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: Jody May 06, 2012, 03:35:10 PM
Speaking of websites, does anyone know what is going on with the other so called "official" website?  It has been offline for over a month; and no notice was sent to us telling it was not operational or just what is going on.  They also stopped sending e-mails on when meetings are scheduled.  I guess that is one sure way to keep people from attending them!!!!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: David May 06, 2012, 04:16:36 PM
Speaking of websites, does anyone know what is going on with the other so called "official" website?  It has been offline for over a month; and no notice was sent to us telling it was not operational or just what is going on.  They also stopped sending e-mails on when meetings are scheduled.  I guess that is one sure way to keep people from attending them!!!!

Jody,

Funny story about the "Official" website...

Apparently it was canceled/shut-down by Appletree Management Group. The funny thing about this is that this board used thousands upon thousands of dollars to sue Mike for this website under the frivolous cause of action of "Trademark Infringement".
 
As the story goes (and as Mike stated in his last post "The Board seems to have realized this was a baseless case and admitted it by filing a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, a motion that means we are the prevailing party on all counts..."

It is pretty clear that the "Official Website" was nothing more than a front to show that they were supposedly informing the members about what is going on in SLCA.

My best guess is that one of the many reasons the board chose to shut down the website was the fact that they had a really huge pink elephant posted on their site called "The covenants"; which though they clearly stated that membership in SLCA is optional, they continued and continue to collect so called "Membership dues" as well as Security fees.

Gee...I wonder if the new "Merged" management company for SLCA actually knows what they just got themselves into/ got Appletree out of, or do they "REALLY" (wink-wink) know and intend on continuing the saga.




: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS May 10, 2012, 07:05:50 AM
New site for SLCA is up.


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS May 11, 2012, 09:06:27 AM
New site for SLCA is up.

           I just checked the new KA DIEHL site this morning and the payment records are posted.
I will tell you, the change over as usual is flawed!!!So get all your paper work out here we go
again,the you cant vote your not in good standing,your not allowed to speak at meeting
nonsense will begin.As I stated before this is the third time around.
           Just for the record,I have never missed a payment since 1975,and I have
the cancelled checks to prove it!!!!!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: David May 12, 2012, 11:47:45 PM
...and what truly adds "injury to insult" (Punn Intended) is knowing those payments NEVER made it to their expected destinations;...roads, sewer, water etc. etc. etc.

Shame on you board for collecting all those on-time payments from Annie for the past 37 years...thinking you would get away with it!

Just for the record...I've been here 6 years...Fool me two years---shame on you board.....try to fool me for the past 4 and counting----SHAME ON YOU BOARD!!!!


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS June 03, 2015, 12:37:49 PM
6/3/2015

Just received voting package for Board Members 2016.
Been aWhile since I have posted ,MY OPINON ONLY

        In the list of canidates I see Valeria Sowell is running.
Valeria bought the house next to mine so I know a little about her.
When she move in seven years ago the community was really looking for change,
and we all know that change did not come easy.
        I recall many town meeting that valeria attented and spoke up for the need and
issues of SLCA. I remember watching board membersslump down in tere seats and
reach for the asprin [some reached for something stronger] when Valeria would raise her hand
to speak.The board member would mumble and stumble over her questions, you new they
 were all praying she would miss the next meeting when the meeting were ajourned.
Valeria was always at the next meeting still seeking answer too her questions. She had the
same effects and results at SLCA meeting. My point is that she made every effort every time
and that not easy when dealing with ignorance.Persistance is a good asset.
        The SLCA community needs board members who wont cave on issues or use the position too
benefit for themself, a board member should be able too discuss and even disagree to reach solutions,
never waste time or money, make time to listen too peoples concerns after all its their money being spent.
Above all a board member must realize its not about them and there title,or special little group
 its about all  who live in the community. The job is to make the whole community   better place
to live,work and play. So I am not telling anyone who too vote for, please just VOTE it matters.

I will vote for Valeria
                                      Annie Mills
                                      6/3/2015


: Re: SLCA OFFICIAL WEBSITE
: ANNA MAE K MILLS June 03, 2015, 12:44:46 PM
6/3/2015

Just received voting package for Board Members 2016.
Been aWhile since I have posted ,MY OPINON ONLY

        In the list of canidates I see Valeria Sowell is running.
Valeria bought the house next to mine so I know a little about her.
When she move in seven years ago the community was really looking for change,
and we all know that change did not come easy.
        I recall many town meeting that Valeria attented and spoke up for the needs and
issues of SLCA. I remember watching board members slump down in there seats and
reach for the asprin [some reached for something stronger] when Valeria would raise her hand
to speak.The board member would mumble and stumble over her questions, you knew they
 were all praying she would miss the next meeting when the meeting was ajourned.
Valeria was always at the next meeting still seeking answer too her questions. She had the
same effects and results at SLCA meeting. My point is that she made every effort every time
and that not easy when dealing with ignorance.Persistance is a good asset.
        The SLCA community needs board members who wont cave on issues or use the position too
benefit for themself, a board member should be able too discuss and even disagree to reach solutions,
never waste time or money, make time to listen too peoples concerns after all its their money being spent.
Above all a board member must realize its not about them and there title,or special little group
 its about all who live in the community. The job is to make the whole community a  better place
to live,work and play. So I am not telling anyone who too vote for, please just VOTE it matters.

I will vote for Valeria
                                      Annie Mills
                                      6/3/2015
[/quote


Sorry, the copyright must be in the template.
Please notify this forum's administrator that this site is missing the copyright message for SMF so they can rectify the situation. Display of copyright is a legal requirement. For more information on this please visit the Simple Machines website.