Activists at Stillwater lakes Forum
October 20, 2017, 09:26:49 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Only registered members are allowed to access this forum. Please login below or click -here- to register an account with Stillwaterlakes.net.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
 11 
 on: October 08, 2013, 10:29:29 AM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by Spitfire
Motion for Variance DENIED!  That was the verdict of the Coolbaugh Township Zoning Board.  They said SLCA did not make their case for needing a variance and said the request was denied "due to testimony."  So 3 residents made a difference in disputing what Jim Ott, Ron Kluge and Brian Courtright said, much of what could be perceived as B.S.  or straight out lies.  

For example:
1. President Lou Killian stated at the meeting on the 21st there would be no gates,(Either Lou is being kept in the dark...or he's crossed over to the "Dark Side".) yet Jim Ott on the 25th said several times that they needed more parking spots for visitors and contractors to check in.  Why would anyone check in unless they need to go through gates?
2.  Ron Kluge stated, erroneously, both on the 21st and 25th that the board can do whatever they want and they are the final decider.  This is dead wrong and residents should be upset that this is his attitude.  That is just  rude,  arrogant, and a total violation of a director’s fiduciary duty.  (...Not to mention being wayyyyy past the boarder of being a "Psychopath")
3.  Ron Kluge stated that the board voted on moving the guardhouse at a meeting but refused to give the date of the meeting. (You would think that he would have least "made up" a date for the fictitious meeting as he's done in the past)  The board is not allowed to vote in executive session or during workshops,(Not according to Norman Bates) so it’s interesting how they voted on something yet no one is aware of such a vote taking place.  Could it be like the meeting that Matt Ducey lied about to open up an illegal account with Tom Wilkins??? (...and today's Sesame Street is brought to you by the word "Cellmates")
4.  Brain Courtright said he remembered gates being in SLCA. (Actually they're called "Chain link fence"; and those were brought down just recently)  This was disputed by a resident who has lived in the community for over 40 years.  The question is, did he deliberately lie or just imagine gates that never existed?
5.  Jim Ott said the guardhouse was not visible to people.(Well...neither is the guard)  Zoning board officials asked if there were signs.  Jim Ott tried to make the case that people don’t read signs.  It sounded like he was making the case that residents were too stupid to read the signs, so they had to move the guardshack in the middle of the parking lot so we could guess why there was a gazebo in the middle of the parking lot and somehow determine that it was the security shack. (It would only be a matter of time before Mr. Bates would've converted it into a toll booth)
6.  Jim Ott also made the case that security cannot see out of the current guardhouse. (That's actually because No one can see during REM sleep)  The case was made that maybe they should remove the paint on the one window and open the closed curtains on the other.  Much easier that tearing down one structure and erecting another. (You kidding?...paint removal would've cost the community at least $50,000.00 if you leave that to Ron)
7.  Jim Ott also said the new structure would be closer to utilities. (Yeah...the guard would then be able to pee in the middle of the road) So there’s electric and internet in the middle of the parking lot but not at the current location, where there is electricity and wifi access?  (Yeah...all this access is actually under the speed hump)
8.  Ron Kluge said SLCA was now able to move the guardshack because they are in good financial shape.  Is this part of the “free money” Lou Killian said paid to pave the roads for the first time in 5 years? (Lou Killian?Huh I thought it was the puppet master-Norman Bates that wrote that in the newsletter.)
9.  Jim Ott submitted plans that did not require a variance but showed up with plans that did.   Again, lying?  Sneaky?  Deliberately deceptive? (More like just plain old deliberate.)

So Ron Kluge, Jim Ott and Brian Courtright are either delusional or outright liars.  You decide. (Ok then; How about just "Delusional Liars?) Either way you should have grave concerns over who is doing what with your money.


 12 
 on: September 27, 2013, 04:41:25 PM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by Noreen
Motion for Variance DENIED!  That was the verdict of the Coolbaugh Township Zoning Board.  They said SLCA did not make their case for needing a variance and said the request was denied "due to testimony."  So 3 residents made a difference in disputing what Jim Ott, Ron Kluge and Brian Courtright said, much of what could be perceived as B.S.  or straight out lies.  

For example:
1. President Lou Killian stated at the meeting on the 21st there would be no gates, yet Jim Ott on the 25th said several times that they needed more parking spots for visitors and contractors to check in.  Why would anyone check in unless they need to go through gates?
2.  Ron Kluge stated, erroneously, both on the 21st and 25th that the board can do whatever they want and they are the final decider.  This is dead wrong and residents should be upset that this is his attitude.  That is just  rude,  arrogant, and a total violation of a director’s fiduciary duty.  
3.  Ron Kluge stated that the board voted on moving the guardhouse at a meeting but refused to give the date of the meeting.  The board is not allowed to vote in executive session or during workshops, so it’s interesting how they voted on something yet no one is aware of such a vote taking place.  Could it be like the meeting that Matt Ducey lied about to open up an illegal account with Tom Wilkins???
4.  Brain Courtright said he remembered gates being in SLCA.  This was disputed by a resident who has lived in the community for over 40 years.  The question is, did he deliberately lie or just imagine gates that never existed?
5.  Jim Ott said the guardhouse was not visible to people.  Zoning board officials asked if there were signs.  Jim Ott tried to make the case that people don’t read signs.  It sounded like he was making the case that residents were too stupid to read the signs, so they had to move the guardshack in the middle of the parking lot so we could guess why there was a gazebo in the middle of the parking lot and somehow determine that it was the security shack.
6.  Jim Ott also made the case that security cannot see out of the current guardhouse.  The case was made that maybe they should remove the paint on the one window and open the closed curtains on the other.  Much easier that tearing down one structure and erecting another.
7.  Jim Ott also said the new structure would be closer to utilities.  So there’s electric and internet in the middle of the parking lot but not at the current location, where there is electricity and wifi access?  
8.  Ron Kluge said SLCA was now able to move the guardshack because they are in good financial shape.  Is this part of the “free money” Lou Killian said paid to pave the roads for the first time in 5 years?
9.  Jim Ott submitted plans that did not require a variance but showed up with plans that did.   Again, lying?  Sneaky?  Deliberately deceptive?

So Ron Kluge, Jim Ott and Brian Courtright are either delusional or outright liars.  You decide.  Either way you should have grave concerns over who is doing what with your money.

 13 
 on: September 14, 2013, 02:45:41 PM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by THE EXPERT
CALIFORNIA DREAMING!

Can we use this case to force the board to give us dissidents, equal access to their webpage, clubhouse, and to promote our own candidates/meetings by distributing flyers just like they do?

Also, shouldn't the cost of all of that come out of the pockets of the association, on common grounds?  READ ALL ABOUT IT!

http://homeownersassociationmanagementla.com/Wittenberg-v.-Beachwalk-Homeowners-Assoc.html

 14 
 on: September 12, 2013, 11:40:06 AM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by admin
Apparently the sewer is quite the money maker.  The auditors report says the sewer expenses are $283,611 for 2012 plus $82,572 for the Pennvest loan payments.  That leaves a net profit of $86,217 for the year.  I believe the PUC was told that if there is excess money it is refunded to the people.  I guess they didn't specify which people!  Maybe that's the $100,000 they said covered the roadwork for this year that "didn't cost us a thing."  It only cost those on sewer - roughly half are subsidizing all.  I don't believe that's legal, but why should they start worrying about legalities now? 

Speaking of legal, in court yesterday Nick Haros stated they are no longer the attorneys for SLCA, only for our case - the one because of this website and discussion board that Nancy Schmerber said we started.  When I said they sued us, she replied "You made us sue you!"  Seriously???  Yup - these are your board members!  But I guess that explains why Jim Ott is providing illegal legal contracts to the community!  So is Jim Ott the new counsel for SLCA?

 15 
 on: September 08, 2013, 01:30:25 PM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by Spitfire

          My point the sewer is a money maker, and it should make money for the entire
community and all its property owners,not outsiders,politicians,lawyers,managers or
board of directors!!


...or Real Estate Moguls!

 16 
 on: September 07, 2013, 10:03:40 AM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by ANNA MAE K MILLS
I have said it before and I will say it again!
The sewer is a lawsuit that the people can win in court!!
580 home time $780.00 equals $452,400.00 per year!!
The board can justify the numbers anyway they
want,but the reality is, it was never used to benefit the
people of the community!!!
        Many years ago I received a letter from the board  about
the sewer and becoming a stockholder?? Something at
the time I was all for, I have never received a dividend to this day!!!
A pattern is appearing,collect money for one thing use it for another,
then sell something thats not yours to buy what you ruined in the
first place so you can start to collect money to fix what you broke
so you can break it again so you can borrow more money to buy it back to fix it!! [NUTS]
          My point the sewer is a money maker, and it should make money for the entire
community and all its property owners,not outsiders,politicians,lawyers,managers or
board of directors!!

 17 
 on: September 06, 2013, 04:20:44 PM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by THE EXPERT

SEWER FOR SALE FOR $1.00?

So, let's form a coalition of homeowners and buy the Sewer Corp.

We can then go to the PUC to set the rates, and that will assure that it will be a profitable venture.

So, where is the COALITION OF THE WILLING ?

The morons on the board claim to the PUC, that they provide sewer services to "members" on a not for profit basis.  That may be true, if only because all of the profits go to profiteers who get to manage the affairs of the sewer corporation. WILKINS - APPLETREE - HAROS & YOUNG, who really cares which on of these jackals are in charge at any one time! That is exactly where the profits are going.

You should have no doubt that having a controlling interest in our sewer system is on Tommy's calender.

So are we going to allow this clown Wilkins, to make millions by turning our not-for-profit sewer system  into his personal honey bucket?

A consortium of dedicated property owners should be able to manage the Sewer Corp’s. financials, much better than the autistic board of directors that presently afflicts this community.

We can simply push the board aside and tell them to drop dead!







 18 
 on: September 06, 2013, 07:37:37 AM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by Noreen
Here is some interesting news:
http://wnep.com/2013/09/05/federal-fraud-charges-filed-in-monroe-county/

I was told by Nick Haros and Allen Young that Mr. Paolillo was partnering with Tom Wilkins buying First Right of Refusals in the Poconos.  I am unsure if he is a partner of Mountain Vista Partners, Tom Wilkins' company that owns SLCA's FRR.  Mr. Paolillo is also the former owner of Alpine Ski Resort, managed by Jim Ott of Appletree for 3 years, and then sold at tax sale oddly enough to Jim Ott of Appletree.  Quite the bargain at $40,000 for 120 acres plus buildings, ski lifts, etc.  It's now going to be auctioned this month, I'm guessing for a bit more than what he paid for it.
http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130725/NEWS/307250326

Sound familiar? 
•Our water company managed to ruin and then sold for less than 1 year's net profit with over half of the sale price going to Tom Wilkins/NEPA Management. 
•Our FRR sold to Tom Wilkins/Mountain Vista Partners for $8,000, netting him hundreds of thousands in a few short years.  (He told the board it was worthless and that they should sell it to him and they did!!!)
•Tom Wilkins trying to sell our sewer plant for $1 while owning our FRR (meaning he could then buy it for $1!)
•Jim Ott/Appletree now looking for partners/buyers for our sewer.

DOES ANYONE ELSE SEE A PATTERN HERE?

 19 
 on: August 21, 2013, 10:20:20 PM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by FIDEL


http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130809/NEWS07/308090352&cid=sitesearch

 20 
 on: August 05, 2013, 09:00:09 PM 
Started by Noreen - Last post by FIDEL
HOW IS SECURITY OR GATES, GOING TO PROTECT US FROM THE ENEMY WITHIN?
“The incident began when a Pocono Mountain Regional Police patrol officer responded to a call about burglaries at a residence belonging to Botke’s mother on Nadine Boulevard, Chief Harry Lewis said early Sunday morning.
Botke had been involved in ongoing issues within his family and had stolen miscellaneous items from the home for drugs, Lewis said. Botke also was out on unsecured bail after allegedly stealing his younger brother’s car during their grandmother’s funeral last month.
While the officer was at the residence for the burglary reports Saturday, Botke arrived and was identified. The officer handcuffed him and placed him in the back of the patrol car, then moved to take statements from the victim.”


“I HAD JUST ARRIVED FOR MY REGULAR SUNDAY VISITS WITH MAMA.... AFTER CHURCH!”
  Kenneth Botke

THE CRIMINALS AND THEIR RELATIVES ARE NOT JUST ON THE BOARD!
THEY RESIDE ALL OVER THIS COMMUNITY! WHAT WE NEED IS FOR THE STATE POLICE TO BE GIVEN THE AUTHORITY TO PATROL, AND PROTECT US FROM THE ENEMY WITHIN!

BY ALL MEANS, LET US ALL RESTRICT VECTOR SECURITY, TO SITTING IN FRONT OF MARIA SANTORRO-HERNANDEZ HOUSE!

MAY EVERYONE LIVE HAPPILY EVER AFTER!


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!